For reference only, declined to reprint, otherwise at your own risk.
On June 1, 2006, the People's Republic of China pharmaceutical industry standard YY0569-2005 was officially implemented. This was a mandatory standard for biosafety cabinets issued by the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) on July 18, 2005. Unlike the construction industry standard JG170-2005, which was prepared by the Ministry of Construction on June 1, 2005, the YY0569-2005 standard was developed based on European and American biosafety standards. Specifically, it incorporated the European standard EN12469:2000 and the U.S. NSF49 biosafety cabinet standard recognized by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). By integrating the most critical aspects of these two global standards and improving their weaker elements, China’s YY0569-2005 became one of the most authoritative biosafety cabinet standards worldwide. Notably, Hong Kong-based Heal Force Biomedical Technology Holding Group participated in the drafting of this standard in 2005, bringing over a decade of experience in biosafety cabinet manufacturing and significant contributions to biosafety in China. As a result, Heal Force became one of the leading organizations involved in setting the standard. In the following discussion, we will explore the differences and connections between China’s YY0569-2005 biosafety cabinet standard and its European and American counterparts, with a particular focus on how China’s standard surpasses others in key areas.
1. **Safety Cabinet Models**
China’s YY0569-2005 follows the same classification as the U.S. NSF49-2002, particularly in the subdivision of secondary biosafety cabinets. All three standards—YY0569, EN12469, and NSF49—share similar classifications for biosafety cabinets in terms of general types and performance requirements.
Primary biosafety cabinets protect personnel and the environment but not the samples. They operate similarly to fume hoods, with HEPA filters installed at the exhaust. The negative airflow through the front window ensures operator safety, while the filtered air protects the environment. These cabinets are rarely used today because they do not provide sample protection.
Secondary biosafety cabinets are the most commonly used type. They feature a front window operation port, allowing operators to work safely while protecting both the personnel and the test samples.
Tertiary biosafety cabinets are designed for high-risk environments, such as level 4 laboratories. They are fully sealed and operated via gloves, often referred to as glove boxes. These are used for handling highly infectious agents.
The classification criteria for secondary biosafety cabinets differ among the standards. While EN12469 provides a basic definition, YY0569 and NSF49 divide them into four types based on airflow velocity, exhaust mode, and recirculation: A1, A2 (formerly B3), B1, and B2.
A1 cabinets require a minimum airflow velocity of 0.40 m/s, with 70% of air recirculated through the HEPA filter and 30% exhausted. A2 cabinets have a higher airflow requirement of 0.5 m/s, with the same air distribution. B1 and B2 cabinets are connected to the lab’s exhaust system, offering additional chemical and biological protection. B2 models are 100% exhaust systems, with no internal air recirculation.
While A1 and B1 cabinets are common in many regions, B2 cabinets are widely used in China and the U.S., but less so in Europe. In the European market, EN12469-compliant cabinets are generally comparable to A2 models in structure, with minor differences. These types are currently the most widely used globally.
2. **Cabinet Structure, Performance, and Testing**
China’s YY0569 standard fully incorporates the strengths of both European and American standards, adopting the most rigorous testing protocols. For example, while EN12469 and NSF49 allow manufacturers flexibility in design as long as performance criteria are met, YY0569 sets specific structural requirements. It mandates a double-sided structure for the working area of Class II A2, B1, and B2 cabinets, ensuring that all contaminated areas remain under negative pressure or within negative pressure channels. The side panels of Class II and III cabinets must be seamless, with sealed joints. This makes YY0569 more detailed and aligned with modern experimental needs than its counterparts.
Heal Force’s safety cabinets, for instance, use a two-layer stainless steel structure with rounded transitions, eliminating hidden contamination risks. This design ensures that all aerosols are captured by the negative pressure system and efficiently filtered, making cleaning and disinfection easier.
3. **Physical Performance Testing and Qualification Criteria**
All three standards—YY0569, EN12469, and NSF49—detail testing methods and qualification criteria for biosafety cabinets. However, there are notable differences:
- **Microbiological Challenge Test**: YY0569 uses the KI-Discus method, a quick physical test that can complete results in under a minute, compared to the 48-hour microbial culture method used in other standards. This allows manufacturers like Heal Force to test every unit before shipping, ensuring consistent quality.
- **Downflow Flow Rate Test**: YY0569 and EN12469 specify a range of 0.25–0.5 m/s, while NSF49 does not. YY0569 also introduces a finer uniform downflow mode, improving accuracy beyond what is required by NSF49.
- **Inflow Airflow Rate Test**: YY0569 and EN12469 estimate inflow using external exhaust flow, whereas NSF49 measures directly. Both YY0569 and NSF49 require a minimum inflow of 0.5 m/s for A2 cabinets, while EN12469 requires 0.4 m/s.
- **High-Efficiency Filter Integrity Test**: YY0569 and NSF49 use aerosol injection methods, while EN12469 uses natural air. Studies show that aerosol injection is more reliable in detecting leaks.
- **Cabinet Leakage Test**: YY0569 uses the pressure decay method, which quantitatively assesses cabinet tightness, while NSF49 relies on soap bubble tests. EN12469 requires independent lab testing rather than factory-level checks.
Heal Force’s cabinets are fully tested using the pressure decay method and aerosol scanning before leaving the factory, ensuring top-tier safety performance.
4. **Work Comfort Standards**
Noise, light intensity, and vibration tests are similar across the standards, though specific thresholds may vary slightly. These factors contribute to user comfort and operational efficiency.
5. **Conclusion**
Although the implementation dates and content of the three standards differ, they share many similarities. China’s YY0569-2005 has refined and enhanced key testing methods from European and American standards, making it the most stringent biosafety cabinet standard globally. Proper selection, use, and maintenance of biosafety cabinets according to these standards are essential for maintaining laboratory safety.
Electric Toothbrush,Oral Electric Toothbrush,Household Toothbrush,Waterproof Ipx7 Electric Toothbrush
ZHEJIANG SHENGFA ELECTRIC APPLIAMNCES CO.,LTD , https://www.sfelectricappliances.com